Language and Ideology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Language and ideology - Essay ExampleThat is, language does not exist without ideology and ideology does not exist without language. delinquent to its artificiality, language and its application through narrative is vulnerable to manipulation that functions as a justification for the interests of legitimate power relatives within society. Since both language and ideology are culturally embedded, all forms of lingual representation must be understood as constructed and mediated. The aim of the critic becomes the deconstruction of the form and subject matter of genial expression that is constituted through the dynamic inter-relation of language and the ideas that it supports and perpetuates.To understand its relation to ideology, we must start examine how language is formulated from a material perspective. According to Ferdinand de de Saussures seminal analysis of the structure of speech communication and their associated meanings, the former is never a transparent indicator of the latter. In his Course in General Linguistics, Saussure maintained that language should be divided into two comp one(a)nts langue, referring to the entire body of a language, and parole, referring to a specific utterance or individual act of speech within a language. The latter can except be comprehended within the larger system of the former. That is, the meaning of sacred scriptures or signs is derived from their relation to one an new(prenominal)(a) within a cumulative structure or system of signification.1 To illustrate this principle, Saussure draw a clearly discernable distinction between the signifier, or word, and the signified, or that to which the word refers or claims to represent. For example, the word tree is only indicative of the external, material object of a tree insofar as we intend and regard it to be. The word tree can just as easily be applied to other external, material objects. In this way, the formation of words and their meanings is an entirely arti ficial, constructed, and enclosed relation.2Saussures analysis of language instigated a substructure rethinking of our understanding of subjectivity, culture, and power. Since the linguistic system of signs, or semiotics, is a product not of a natural relation between signifier and signified but of the human mind generating and organizing signs into meaning, Saussure concluded that the methodical subscribe to of languages would lead to new discoveries about human nature on both the individual and the collective level. Amongst the virtually influential thinkers to further this conclusion was the structural anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss. In his 1958 work, Structural Anthropology, Levi-Strauss introduced structuralism as the systematic try on to uncover deep universal mental structures as these manifest themselves in kinship and larger social structures, in literature, philosophy and mathematics, and in the unconscious psychological patterns that motivate human behaviour3 This throw is an extension of Saussures proposed science of semiology. As Saussure wrote, Linguistics is only one branch of this general science. The laws which semiology go away discover will be laws applicable to linguistics, and the linguistics will thus be assigned to a clearly defined place in the field of human knowledge.4 Applying Saussures understanding of linguistic systems to other domains of social inquiry, such as methods of economic exchange, kinship, food, and myths, Levi-Strauss viewed